9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 142X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 26th June, 2012 by the Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai. That order revokes his licence, namely, Customs House Agent Licence No. 11/126 and visits him with forfeiture of entire amount of security deposit. 4. We have heard Mr. Jetly appearing in support of this appeal and Mr. Prakash Shah appearing on behalf of the respondent. 5. There is no dispute about the factual position. The only ground on which the Tribunal has interfered with the order of the Commissioner is that the initial inquiry resulted in submission of a Report by the Inquiry Officer. That report indicates that the Inquiry Officer dropped the charges levelled against the respondent under Regulations 12 and 13 (n). There were other two charges under Regul ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... all charges. This is not merely a matter of procedure but one of substance. Even the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Delta Logistics v. Union of India, reported in 2012 (286) E.L.T. 517 lays down such a principle. If that is applicable, then, the Tribunal did not commit any error in setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner. 8. The above opinion expressed by us further enabled us to direct Mr. Jetly, appearing for the appellant, to take instructions as to whether the Commissioner desires to initiate the process in accordance with law, at least now. If he does not, then, we would rest content with the conclusion that the appellate order of the Tribunal does not raise any substantial question of law, we would h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , presses for restoration of the licence and forthwith. 12. Mr. Jetly submits that the licence was initially suspended and thereafter cancelled and with effect from 4th July, 2012. That cancellation was set aside by the Tribunal on 12th June, 2013. In spite of a favourable Tribunal order, the respondent failed to take steps to apply for restoration of the licence. In the appeal of the Revenue, now this Court should not restore the licence but proceed to deny this request, is the submission of Mr. Jetly. 13. We express no opinion on the course adopted by the Division Bench in the case of HP Joshi (supra). Prima facie, there is substance in the contention of Mr. Jetly that in the appeal of the Revenue to challenge a order of the T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
