TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 492X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of this Court in ‘Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v. Pentamedia Graphics Ltd.’ [2006 (5) TMI 90 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], in favour of the assessee - Decided against Revenue. - Civil Appeal Nos. 4484-4486 of 2004 - - - Dated:- 9-4-2015 - A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ. Shri K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Rajiv Nanda, Ms. Aruna Gupta and Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocates, for the Appell ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g to demand the duty not paid on the ground that the item falls under Chapter sub-heading No. 8524.90. 3. The adjudicating authority passed three orders on the aforesaid show cause notices confirming the demand contained therein and also imposing penalties. The orders were confirmed by the Commissioner. However, in further appeal, Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside tho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|