Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (8) TMI 688

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d by the Board is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case and, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this appeal - Decided against Revenue. - C.M.A. No. 2562 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 3-7-2015 - R Sudhakar And K. B. K. Vasuki, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. S Xavier Felix For the Respondent : Notice served JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. Sudhakar, J.) Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal in rejecting the appeal filed by it, the Revenue/appellant is before this Court by filing the present appeal. This appeal was admitted by this Court, on 23.12.2010, on the following substantial questions of law :- 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribuna .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . It appears that the services availed on the bills of Telephones (attached to the office) / Insurance Policy ( Health Insurance ) / Group Personal Accident were not connected with the manufacturing activities and the Service Tax credit availed as input service credit on the above services did not appear to be in order and appeared to be recoverable. Thus, a show cause notice was issued directing the assessee to show cause as to why an amount of ₹ 1,60,116/- (service tax credit ₹ 92,901/-) + 64077/-) + Edu. Cess ( i.e. 1857/- + 1281/-) being the wrong availment of Service Tax Credit should not be recovered from them under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 read with Section 11 A of CEA 1944. After due process of law, the Order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... including fine and penalty is ₹ 1 Lakh and below. Similarly, in the case of High Courts, appeals should not be filed in cases where the duty involved or total revenue including fine or penalty is ₹ 2 Lakhs and below. While deciding the thresholds mentioned above the duty involved shall be the decisive element. For example, in a case involving duty of ₹ 1 Lakh with mandatory penalty of ₹ 1 Lakh besides any other penalty imposed under the relevant provisions of Law, no appeal shall henceforth be filed in the Tribunal as the duty involved is within the monetary limit of ₹ 1 Lakh. Similarly, if the duty involved in a case is ₹ 2 Lakhs with equal mandatory penalty and any other penalty imposed under the Law in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates