2012 (6) TMI 783

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) for the Respondent ORDER Heard both sides. 2.Both these appeals arise out of the same impugned order against which M/s. Ellen Industries had filed Appeal No. E/1/2012 and in their case predeposit of 50% of the duty amount has been ordered vide a detailed order passed on 26.3.2012. These two appeals have been filed by the co-noticees against whom there are no duty demands but only penalties ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... penalty amount within four weeks from today. 3.As regards the other appellant, M/s. Sri Meenakshi Steels, an adjournment request has been received but since there is a connected appeal and the issue is exactly similar, there is no justification for adjourning the case. 4.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel and accepting the offer made by him, both the appellants are directed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X