2015 (9) TMI 584

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bsp;                        For the Respondent:  Shri Rajeev Tandon, AR ORDER PER: R.K.SINGH Appeals have been filed against imposition of penalty. 2. The facts of the case are as under:- 2.1 The appellant provided commercial or industrial construction services and availe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unt charged did not include the amount of free supplies given by the service recipient for claiming abatement under Notification No.15/2004-ST. 3. While no one appeared on behalf of the appellant, learned DR stated that in view of the CESTATs judgement of Bhayana Builders Pvt.Ltd. vs. CST, Delhi-2013 (32) ELT 49 (Tri.-LB) he had nothing to say against the appellants contention. 4. We have consid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X