9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (9) TMI 890X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or Advocate with Mr Pushkar Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel. ORDER 1. The appeal as originally filed was directed against the order dated 11th May, 2015 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate ('CESTAT') requiring the Appellant Assessee to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 78 lakhs for considering its appeal against an Order-in-Origi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... C as well as the CESTAT was the failure by the Appellant to furnish complete particulars despite repeated opportunities. 4. It is not in dispute that the returns in Form ST-3 filed online by the Appellant was rejected by the computer on the ground of some error and was not re-filed till after a Show Cause Notice was issued to the Appellant on 18th October, 2012. 5. The Court finds that the Appel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tial impugned order dated 2nd July, 2015 of the CESTAT are hereby set aside and the appeal of the Appellant is restored to the file of the CESTAT for disposal on merits subject to the Appellant depositing a sum of Rs. 25 lakhs on or before 31st August, 2015. It is made clear that if there is any default in making the above deposit by 31st August 2015, the aforesaid impugned orders of the CESTAT wo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
