9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (8) TMI 10X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s below: Which clause in Section 65 to the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 will be applicable to the supply of technical know-how, for the purposes of classification, since the same is not classifiable under clause (55a) for Intellectual Property Services? 3. The applicant has entered into agreements with its foreign collaborators for the supply of the technical know-how and assistance for use in the manufacture of certain pharmaceutical products the Indian company is engaged in. 4. The comments on the application were furnished by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. 5. Before the question as to classification of service specified in the application could be adopted for examination leading to pronouncement of advance r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not allow the application where the question raised in the application is,- (a) already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer, the Appellate Tribunal or any Court; (b) the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court: Provided further that no application shall be rejected under this sub-section unless an opportunity has been given to the applicant of being heard: Provided also that where the application is rejected, reasons for such rejection shall be given in the order. 8. A perusal of the provisions, extracted above, would show that under the first proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 96D of the Act, the Authority cannot allow the application or, in other words ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed by any of the authorities. The word same lexically means identical , not different or very similar , vide the Concise Oxford Dictionary and the Chambers 21st Century Dictionary. The Black's Law Dictionary defines the word same as the very thing just mentioned or described . In our view, the question raised in the application under consideration cannot be termed as the same as in a matter already decided, the question of the same being already pending in a Court does not arise. Therefore, the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act is not attracted, and the application cannot be disallowed on the basis of the first ground. 10. The second ground concerns the definition of the expression advance ruling a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
