2015 (10) TMI 670

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ribunal has again dismissed the review application holding that the fact recorded in the earlier judgment dated 7-11-2012 was correct - No question of law arises - Decided against assessee. - Tax Case No. 6 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 19-3-2014 - Yatindra Singh and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. ORDER This is a tax appeal by M/s. Shalimar Ispat Udyog (the Assessee) under section 35-G of the Cen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Commissioner for re-decision. The Commissioner, by his order dated 23-5-2003, again upheld his earlier order. 5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the Assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal. It was dismissed. Thereafter, the Assessee filed appeal namely Tax Case 21 of 2004. It was allowed by this court on 1-12-2005 and the matter was sent back to the Tribunal for re-decision. 6. The Tr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s. 12. The order dated 7-11-2012 was passed on the agreement between the parties. It is for this reason that this Court had permitted the Assessee to withdraw the appeal and file review application before the Tribunal. 13. The Tribunal has again dismissed the review application holding that the fact recorded in the earlier judgment dated 7-11-2012 was correct. 14. The order passed by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X