TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 697X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ri Rajesh Singh Chauhan, for the Respondent. ORDER We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Rajesh Singh Chauhan for the Revenue. 2. This appeal under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 has been filed by the appellant against an order dated 26-3-2014 passed by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissing the application filed by it seeking extension ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dismissal of the appeal by this Court on 19-11-2014, it is not open to the appellant to put to challenge the order passed interregnum proceedings. It is well settled that all orders passed during the pendency of the proceedings stands merged with the final order.
4. In view of above, the appeal is not maintainable and accordingly stands dismissed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|