TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 2093X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... here is no clarity on the fact in respect of the demand - Matter remanded back to Adjudicating Authority – Proper opportunity of hearing given and issue to be examined at length – Appeal allowed in favour of the Appellant. - Appeal No.ST/141/2008-DB - Order No.A/11321/2015 - Dated:- 14-9-2015 - MR. P.K. DAS, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And MR. P.M. SALEEM, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For The Petitioner: Sh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that at the best, the Appellant is required to pay interest of the excess utilization of the credit. He relied upon on the decisions of Tribunal in the case of DHL Logistics Pvt.Ltd Vs CCE 2015 (38) STR 620 (Tri-Mum) and in the case of Mumbai International Airport Pvt.Ltd. Vs CCE 2014 (33) STR308 (Tri-Mum). He further submits that in any event, the penalty cannot be imposed in this case. He relied ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|