2015 (11) TMI 547

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... have been encumbered and charged to the 3rd respondent, which was recorded by the Registrar of Companies as provided under the Companies Act. The petitioner asserted that there is no such due to the 3rd respondent and it is only for the reason of the Company being defunct that the charge was not lifted, after clearing the dues to the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent has also filed a counter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ore this Court contending that the petitioner-Company has been defunct for long, from 2010 onwards, and that under a Scheme formulated by the Central Government, the petitioner had applied for winding up of the Company after filing returns, which have been defaulted. By that time, the Registrar of Companies had filed a prosecution before the Economic Offences Court at Ernakulam, which is produced .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Companies as provided under the Companies Act. The petitioner asserted that there is no such due to the 3rd respondent and it is only for the reason of the Company being defunct that the charge was not lifted, after clearing the dues to the 3rd respondent. 4. The 3rd respondent has also filed a counter affidavit, clearly indicating that there is no amount outstanding in the name of the petition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X