9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (11) TMI 557X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ra Dying & Printing Works. Impugned order is not holding anything against appellant Mohanlal Silk Mills, quite rightly so, as there was no appeal before him on findings against Mohanlal Silk Mills. When the revenue has not preferred any appeal against the adjudicating authority's order in respect of appellant M/s Mohanlal Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.; the appeal filed by the appellant before the Tribunal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vocate For the Respondent : Shri S. Hasija, Supdt. (AR) ORDER Per: Shri M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) 1. These two appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal No. SB/04/TH-I/10 dated 11.01.2010. 2. Since both the appeals are directed against a very same impugned order, they are disposed of by a common order. 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. 4. On perus ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is not holding anything against appellant Mohanlal Silk Mills, quite rightly so, as there was no appeal before him on findings against Mohanlal Silk Mills. When the revenue has not preferred any appeal against the adjudicating authoritys order in respect of appellant M/s Mohanlal Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.; the appeal filed by the appellant before the Tribunal is not maintainable and is dismissed as s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er Road, Kalyan (W) within 30 days from the receipt of this notice as to why penalty should not be imposed on each of them under the provisions of Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. It can be seen from the above reproduced paragraph of show cause notice that Arvind Mohanlal Jain was not directed to show cause as to why penalty be not imposed on him. I also find that the first appellat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
