2015 (11) TMI 624

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eligible for the benefit of exemption Notification No.06/2005 during the remaining part of the financial year 2007-08. Extending that benefit, the appellant claims, the demand would reduce to ₹ 1,43,858/- (which is more than 50% of the impugned demand). Accordingly, we order pre-deposit of ₹ 1,43,858/- along with proportionate interest within eight weeks. Compliance is to be reported b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... zq) of the Finance Act, 1994]. 2. The appellant has contended that the service was provided as a composite contract and therefore during the period 01.04.2007 to 31.05.2007 it was not liable to service tax. For the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008, it was eligible for the benefit of exemption Notification No.06/2005 and in this fashion that the service tax liability would work out to ₹ 1,4 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X