2015 (11) TMI 723

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Respondent : Mr. Amresh Jain, DR ORDER Per Justice G. Raghuram : Proceedings were initiated against the appellant vide Show Cause Notice dated 16.08.2012 alleging non-remittance of service tax for having provided Franchise Service during 2011-12 and proposing service tax demand of Rs. 2,38,26,834/- apart from interest and penalties. After the due process, the impugned adjudication order d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d 28.04.2015 also informed the respondent about such deposit made in relation to the adjudication order dated 17.12.2013. In the circumstances, we consider that the amount already deposited is sufficient pre-deposit for hearing the appeal. The balance demand is waived and we grant stay of proceedings for recovery, during the pendency of the appeal.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X