Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

Rule for value of Excisable Goods.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Sir, If a manufacturer clearing 95% of his finished goods to the related buyer and remaining 5% to other independent buyers, then under what Rule of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 , the value of the Excisable goods will be determined. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Goods sold/cleared to related buyer will be assessed under Rule 9 o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f Central Excise (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods), Rules, 2000 and goods sold to independent buyer will be assessed on transaction value. Rule 9 has been amended/substituted vide Notification No. 14/2013-CE(NT) dated 22.11.2013 effective from 1.12.2013 - Reply By Vishal Kulkarni - The Reply = To clarify further, value of goods to be determined as per CAS -4 +10% i.e. 110% of cost .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of production in case removal of goods to related party. Cost of production shall be determined as per CAS -4 standard. Sale to third party shall be on transaction value. Regards, Vishal - Reply By YAGAY AND SUN - The Reply = Dear Kunal, the Hon ble Supreme Court in the matter of M/s. Nirma Ltd. and Others . = 2015 (11) TMI 605 - SUPREME COURT regarding determination of cost of pro .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... duction as per CAS-4. It was held by the Supreme Court that three elements i.e. interest, depreciation and profit margin not to be included. Regards, YS - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = I agree with both the replies dated 3.12.2015 of Sh.Vishal Kulkarni and M/s. YAGAY and SUN. Thanks a lot for additional information. - Reply By Kunal Pawar - The Reply = Thank you, Shri Kasturi S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ir and all. But, I want to clarify that the sale made by manufacturer is to a trading company having his family members as Directors and the company is doing advertisement and promotional activities and subsequently, selling the goods at higher rates. In this circumstance, what prices would be the value for the purpose of Central Excise, selling price of manufacturer to trading company or sale p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rice of trading company to ultimate buyers. - Reply By Rakesh Singh - The Reply = Dear YS, Depreciation to the extent not forming part of manufacturing overheads is excluded. Such depreciation which form part of manufacturing overheads are part of cost of production. - Reply By Dilip Kudal - The Reply = Dear Pawar, In this case, valuation on the basis of CAS-4 is not needed as their is sal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e and not captive consumption. The prices at which manufacturer sells the goods to other buyers who are not related can be considered as normal price for clearances to related company in terms of amended Rule 9 of Valuation Rules, 2000 . But the aspect of addition of marketing expenses etc. needs to be examined in detail. Otherwise, the prices at which the related trading company sells goods to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... customers can be taken as prices for arriving at Excisable Value. - Reply By YAGAY AND SUN - The Reply = Dear Rakesh, We hereby request you to please share us with the more information on Depreciation which is required to be added or not required to be added vis-a-vis to Nirma Judgment for the sake of clarity on this aspect. Thanks in advance for putting more clarity on this subject matter. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Regards, YAGAY and SUN - Reply By Rakesh Singh - The Reply = Dear YS, Relevant Para of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment is reproduced below:- The impugned order of the tribunal shall reflect that the Tribunal has kept in mind the Cost Accounting Standard-4 (CAS-4) as adopted by the department itself. On that basis it has come to the conclusion that the three aforesaid elements o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f cost which were sought to be included by the Department could not be the factors which would be taken into consideration for arriving at the cost of production. After going through the reasons given by the Tribunal in support of the aforesaid conclusion we find no error therein. The words in bold and italics are important read with Tribunal order Para 2.1.1 .. (i) (a) The depreciation .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... figure which includes depreciation on catalyst has to be reduced to avoid duplication of cost. To clarify the point, you will appreciate that this part i.e part of the depreciation included in the catalyst was sought to be included by the Department which was also part of the total Depreciation and this part of the Depreciation and rightly so shall not be forming part of the cost of production. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... You may also appreciate that as per CAS-4, Depreciation is part of the Manufacturing overheads having relation with the product manufacturing process and not other Depreciation i.e Administration and marketing related. Therefore the Judgment read with Tribunal conclusions is the right position as per CAS-4 as well. regards Rakesh Singh - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Dear Sh.Dilip Ku .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dal, With reference to your reply dated 3.12.2015, I want to point out that Rule 9 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 also talks of Rule 8 ibid i.e. for determination of valuation of goods consumed captively. - Reply By Dilip Kudal - The Reply = Dear Shri Kasturiji, In Rule 9 , recourse to Rule 8 is made in case there is no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sale. Here Shri Pawar has clarified that related company is selling the goods. So, Rule 8 wont attract in this case. Kindly communicate difference of opinion if any. Regards - Rule for value of Excisable Goods. - Query Started By: - Kunal Pawar Dated:- 2-12-2015 Central Excise - Got 11 Replies - Central Excise - Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing, reply post by an expert, personal opini .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates