2007 (1) TMI 569

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m Lata Bansal and Vishnu Sharma for the Appellant. G.K. Shukla for the Respondent. ORDER 1. This appeal was admitted on 1-11-2004 and the following sole substantial question of law was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... interest income as business income but only disallowed netting. When the CIT(A) allowed netting of interest, the revenue went in appeal before the ITAT. It was correctly noted by the ITAT that the Ass .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X