TMI Blog1997 (5) TMI 427X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r of the High Court of Bombay, made on January 20, 1997 in Writ Petition 6182 of 1996. The admitted position is that the respondent No.1. is the owner of the property and earlier a notice was issued to the appellant to vacate the land in question. That order of eviction became final with the confirmation of the order by this Court in a special leave petition. Thereafter, proceedings were initia ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SCR 335]; Ram Chand Ors. vs Union of India Ors.[(1994)1 SCC 44 ]; and Mohamad Kavi Mohamad Amin vs. Fatmabai Ibrahim [CA No. 5023/85 decided on August 22, 1996]. We find no force in the contention. It is seen that the order of ejectment against the applicant has become final. Section 21 of the Mamalatdar s Court Act does not prescribe any limitation within which the order needs to be executed. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|