9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 1034X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondent : Mr. K. Mohanamurali JUDGMENT V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J The appellant has come up with the above appeal challenging a condition imposed by the second respondent Tribunal, directing the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs for entertaining an appeal against the order of the Commissioner. 2. Heard Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr.K.Mohanamurali, learned Senio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 992. The appellant was given an option to redeem the goods upon payment of redemption fees of Rs. 20 lakhs. A fine of Rs. 40 lakhs under Section 114(i) and another fine of Rs. 5 lakhs under Section 114(AA) of the Customs Act were also imposed, apart from three other penalties. 5. As against the order in original, the appellant filed two appeals in C/S/155/2011 and C/192/2011 before the second res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t weeks. Aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the appellant is before us. 7. At the time when the appellant filed an appeal against the first order in original dated 29.3.2011, the Tribunal entertained the appeal without any pre-deposit condition and disposed of the appeal at that stage itself. As a matter of fact, the appellant was better off with the first order in original dated 29.3.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
