2015 (5) TMI 982

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... osh Nath, Asstt Commissioner ( AR ) ORDER Per Ramesh Nair These appeals are directed against Orders-in-Appeal No. P-III/VM/239/2009 dtd. 6/11/09, and No. PIII/VM/238/2009 dated 6/11/2009 passed by the Commissioner of Central (Appeals), Pune-III, wherein Ld. Commissioner upholding the demand of Cenvat credit, rejected the appeals of the appellant. 2. The facts of the case is that appellant is m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... alongwith interest and penalty for wrong availment of Cenvat Credit. Show cause notices were adjudicated wherein demand of Cenvat Credit was confirmed and penalty and interest were demanded. Aggrieved by the said orders, appellant filed appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) who upheld the demand and rejected the appeals. 3. None appeared on behalf of the appellant nor any request for adjournm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d not allowed beyond the place of removal i.e. factory gate. The goods have been cleared for export from the place of removal. In case of export, ownership of the goods remains with exporter and therefore all the expenditure for the clearances of the goods up to port is borne by the exporters and in the present case also the export price is CIF therefore place of removal in case of export stand ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X