Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (1) TMI 575

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the goods manufactured by it were not excisable and, therefore, it was not liable to pay any excise duty. 3. On 10th April, 2002 a search was conducted in the premises of the petitioner and it appears that the Central Excise Officers were of the view that the goods manufactured by the petitioner were excisable. Accordingly, on 11th September, 2003 a show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner in which it was alleged that the petitioner was manufacturing excisable goods. 4. In the meanwhile, the petitioner seems to have registered itself with the Central Excise Department on 18th September, 2002 and thereafter it also filed its returns. 5. After receiving the show cause notice dated 11th September, 2003, the Petitioner moved an a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unit, were not required to register themselves before the central excise department as all of their products were exempt from duty. However, when the readymade garments became dutiable, the applicant was liable to file a declaration with the central excise authorities. But in the instant application, the applicant did not register with the central excise authorities for almost one year. In fact, it was only after the visit of the central excise authorities, that, the applicant registered themselves with the Central excise department. The question, whether the registration was effected before the SCN or not is irrelevant at this time. We, therefore, find that the applicant does not satisfy the conditions of Section 32E of the Central Excise .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onsidered in accordance with law. 10. On the facts of the present case, it seems that returns for the period in dispute were not filed by the petitioner although it had filed its returns for the subsequent period. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, relying on the decision in M/s. Bharat Industries Works, that the petitioner will file the returns for the period in dispute within six weeks from today. If that is done, the application already filed by the petitioner before the Settlement Commission will stand revived and should then be considered on merits. 11. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file its returns for the period in dispute within six weeks from today. If that is done, the Settlement Commission wil .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates