9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (7) TMI 1063X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... deposited employee's contribution towards Provident Fund and ESI after due date as prescribed under the relevant Act, but before the due date of filing of return under the Income Tax Act, no disallowance could be made in view of the provisions of Section 43B as amended by Finance Act, 2003. In the present case, the assessee had remitted the employees contribution beyond the due date for payment, but within the due date for filing the return of income. Hence, following the above-said decisions, we find no reason to differ with the findings of the Tribunal. - Decided against revenue - Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.585 and 586 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 24-7-2015 - Mr. R.SUDHAKAR And Mrs. S.VIMALA, JJ. For Appellant : Mr.T.R. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court in the case of CIT V. Amil Ltd. reported in 321 ITR 508 and that of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s.Venkateswara Electrical Industries P. Ltd. V. DCIT in ITA Nos.1344, 1345 and 1636/Mds/2014 dated 28.8.2014 held as follows: 5. Heard both sides. Perused orders of lower authorities and the decisions relied on before us. It is not in dispute that all these payments of provident fund ₹ 16,20,571/- and ESI ₹ 17,51,490/- were made beyond the grace period/due date allowed under Provident Fund ESI Acts but before due date for filing of income-tax return. This issue has been decided in favour of the assessee by various High Courts following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... after due date as prescribed under the relevant Act but before the due date of filing of return under the Income Tax Act, no dis-allowance could be made in view of the provisions of section 43B as amended by the Finance Act, 2003. The decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has been followed by the co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of JCIT Vs. M/s.S.M.Apparels (P) Ltd. (supra). The Tribunal has been consistently following the view taken by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. Accordingly, we hold that the assessee is entitled to claim expenditure on employee's contribution towards ESI and Provident Fund for both the AYs. Accordingly, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed. 6. Respectfully following the above, de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
