2011 (5) TMI 968

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 01.2011 when the recovery action was initiated, is not sufficient to hold that there is no delay in preferring of the above appeal. No satisfactory explanation has been given by the assessees for the delay - delay cannot be condoned - appeal is also dismissed as barred by limitation. - E/COD/101/2011, E/S/56/2011 and E/96/2011 - Stay Order No. 500/2011 Misc Order No. 255/2011 Final Order No. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed, is not sufficient to hold that there is no delay in preferring of the above appeal. Calculating the delay from Mar.'09, there has been an inordinate delay of over 1 year and 11 months in filing the appeal. No satisfactory explanation has been given by the assessees for the delay. I, therefore, decline to condone the delay. Hence the COD and Stay applications are dismissed and consequently .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X