2011 (10) TMI 635

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1 Two questions of law raised by the Revenue in this Appeal, which read thus: (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal, in law, was right in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 7,60,815/made as per SEBI Interest Regulation Scheme, 2004, by holding that the liability crystalised during the previous year, even though interest pertained to earlier period? (2) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , the counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the Revenue in the case of the Income Tax Commissioner Mumbai City-4 vs. Angel Capital & Debit Market Ltd. Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 475 of 2011 has been dismissed on 28th July, 2011. Accordingly, the second question cannot be entertained. 4 Appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
Case laws, Decisions, Ju .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X