2013 (10) TMI 1396

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . M.V. Ravindaran; When these two stay petitions were called out, none appears on behalf of the appellant nor there is any request for adjournment. It is seen from the record that these matters were listed on 17.07.2013 and on which date there was a request from the advocate on record for adjournment and the same was granted and the matter was listed for disposal today. 2. On perusal of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e authorities is not correct as few of the service recipients have not paid the amount due to them. In our view, the ground taken by the appellant can be considered at the time of final disposal of appeal. Since the appellant has charged and collected an amount of ₹ 8,72,51,694/- and has not deposited the entire amount, we direct the appellant to deposit an amount of ₹ 83,00,000/- (Ru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llant to deposit ₹ 72,00,000/- (Rupees seventy two lakhs only) within eight weeks from today and report compliance before Deputy Registrar on 05.12.2013. Deputy Registrar after ascertaining the compliance will place the file before the bench on 12.12.2013 for passing further orders. Subject to such compliance being reported the applications for the waiver of pre-deposit of balance amounts in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X