TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 503X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... E RESPONDENT : MR. RAHUL R DHOLAKIA, ADVOCATE, MR MANISH R. BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE, MR RUTVIJ OZA, APP ORAL ORDER 1. Rule. Mr. Manish Bhatt, Senior Counsel appearing with Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt waives service of notice of Rule for respondent No.1, Mr. Rahul R. Dholakia, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule for respondent No.2 and Mr. Rutvij Oza, learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d submitted that while rejecting the aforesaid petition, this Court observed in para 26 as under: "[26] Now, the important aspect which is required to be noted at this stage is that the respondent No.1 has specifically stated on oath in the affidavit-in-reply submitted before this Court in para 13 on page 137 that in the event the petitioner owns up the contents of 42 gunny bags upon said Muddam ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he copy of the documents lying in 42 gunny bags is not supplied to the petitioner then prejudice would be caused to the petitioner, is misconceived." 5. Learned counsel thereafter submitted that against the order passed by this Court, the applicant preferred SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. However, the said SLP was dismissed. In view of the order passed by the learned Sessions Court/Trial ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nion that once the statement, under the instruction of the officer, was made before this Court by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and the same is also reiterated today during the course of hearing, respondent No.1 shall provide the copy of the documents lying in 42 gunny bags to the applicant on payment of requisite fees. As and when such application is given by the ap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|