9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (6) TMI 952X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Manoharan Sundaram, Additional Government Pleader (Tax) JUDGMENT Heard Mr. T. Pramodkumar Chopda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Manoharan Sundaram, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax), appearing for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition, challenging the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aimed input tax and paid tax (output tax) thereon after adjusting/ set-off input tax credit. The respondent issued a notice dated September 11, 2013 proposing to levy higher rate of tax on inter-State sales for Rs. 1,17,87,722 not covered by C forms. Pursuant to the same, the petitioner filed C forms (55 numbers) covering entire inter-State sale for Rs. 1,19,65,011. After receipt of the C forms, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -wise details. Accordingly, the petitioner filed details on February 6, 2014. Thereafter, to the shock and surprise, the respondent passed the impugned order levying higher rate of tax on inter-State sales covered by valid C forms on erroneous and flimsy grounds. Hence, challenging the same, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. The learned counsel appearing for the petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that though sufficient reason has been given for the delay in filing the C forms, the same has not been considered. Thus, the short point for consideration is regarding the reason for the delay. The section clearly says that it is for the petitioner to give reasonable cause for the delay. In this case, due to personal inconvenience, the petitioner has produced the C form belatedly. Normally, illne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
