9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (10) TMI 148X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. The appellants have filed service tax return from time to time and have also paid certain amounts of service tax as determined by them. In addition, they have also predeposited Rs. 20.00 lakhs (Rupees twenty lakhs) under the direction of the Tribunal at the stay stage. 2. After hearing both sides at length, we find that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h cases for want of clarification in this regard from the Department. 3. Heard the id. DR for the Department, who supports the impugned order and he refers to the statement of the appellants which has been reproduced in page 9 (Para 8) of the impugned order. 4. After hearing both sides and perusing the case records, we are of the view that in terms of the said Rule 6(1) of the Service Tax Rules, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... The appellants shall be given an adequate opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The appellants are directed to fully cooperate with the original authority and furnish to him all the related documents to enable him to compute the tax liability in terms of the principles laid down by us above. The determination of penalty and applicability of extended period of time shall be determine ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
