2011 (7) TMI 1233

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rade for the respondent. JUDGEMENT The motion seeks condonation of a delay of 2545 days on the part of the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) in filing an appeal against the order of the CESTAT dated 27 March 2003. Appeals were filed before the Supreme Court against the order of the Tribunal. Civil Appeals (C.A. Nos. 12641266 of 2003 together with Civil Appeal No.1496/2004) were disposed of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not been explained at all in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. No material has been placed on record by the applicant to justify the condonation of delay. In that view of the matter, the Notice of Motion cannot be entertained and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. 2 In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the appeal does not survive and is accordingly disposed of.
Case .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X