TMI Blog2016 (5) TMI 1075X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 02/2007-Cus, dated 14.09.2007, as amended by Notification No.93/2008 dated 1.8.2008 - Sale of goods - Refund rejected as the petitioner has not paid VAT/CST on the said goods - Appeal is pending before CESTAT - Held that:- the first respondent is directed to dispose of the appeals preferred by the petitioner as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5 (3) 400592016 dated 12.01.2016 (4) 405892016 dated 29.03.22016 (5) 405872016 dated 29.03.2016 (6) 405932016 dated 29.03.2016 (7) 405882016 dated 29.03.2016 (8) 405912016 dated 29.03.2016 (9) 405902016 dated 29.03.2015, (10) 405922016 dated 29.03.2016, filed by the petitioner within a reasonable time to be fixed by the Court. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sistant Commissioner rejected the claim holding that the petitioner is not eligible for refund under the aforesaid notification, as the petitioner has not paid VAT/CST on the said goods. 6. Aggrieved over the said order, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals). The appeal has also been rejected, vide order dated 26.11.2015, on the ground that the petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|