9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (5) TMI 1195X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... K. Salecha submits that the petitioner accused is an engineering graduate and also MBA from the University of Hull, England having a status of NRI since last 22 years. The petitioner is having trade licence in the name of Ocean Building Maintenance (L.L.C.) from the Government of Dubai and is working at Dubai. The licence is going to expire on 11.3.2016. Therefore, his presence at Dubai is necessary. He submits that a letter dated 18.12.2013 is also received from his Sponsor informing that he is required in Dubai full time for all the employees working in the company, especially for their salaries, timely renewal and cancellations of their visas in Labour and Immigration Office to avoid any delay fines and also for renewal of company Trade ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SCC 673, Salman Khan V/s State of Rajasthan - 2014(4) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 1746, Chitrak Satishbai Shah v/s State of Gujarat, Criminal Misc. Application No.9837/2014, decided on 24.7.2014 by Gujarat High Court and Patel Simaben Arvindbhai v/s State of Gujarat, Criminal Misc. Application No.16815/2015, decided on 11.9.2015 by Gujarat High Court. Learned standing counsel Shri Anil Mehta appearing on behalf of the Union of India submits that it is true that appeal is pending against adjudication order but the presence of the petitioner is required before the learned trial court during trial court of the case. He submits that the impugned order dated 24.4.2015 was not challenged by the Union of India it is challenged only by the petitioner accused. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in advanced." Therefore, the permission was accorded to the accused only on condition to inform the Investigating Officer to go abroad. In the matter of Patel Simaben Arvindbhai (supra), the learned Single Bench of the Gujarat High Court while allowing the anticipatory bail of the accused, a condition was imposed that "the applicant shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court, and passport if any, shall be deposited with the trial Court", was deleted and the trial court was ordered to hand over the passport to the applicant at the earliest. In the case in hand, since the petitioner is having good business at UAE and his wife and family are also residing there if permission will not be given to him to visit UAE, then hi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
