Appellant contends slag was not intended to be manufactured, challenging its classification as excisable goods and duty liability.

Cenvat credit - reversal of credit - since, the appellant had no intention to manufacture slag, the same, should not be considered as excisable goods. Since the slag seized to the excisable goods, the question of dutibility or exemption does not arise. - AT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X