2016 (8) TMI 625

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the appellant Shri Manish Saharan, Advocate for the respondent ORDER Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner, who had dropped the proceedings, against the respondent, Revenue has field the present appeal 2.  After hearing both the sides, we find that M/s. Shree Bajrang Mettalics & Power Ltd. were supplying their final product to M/s. Shree Bajrang Alloys Ltd., who after .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , supplying the goods to M/s. Shree Bajrang Alloys Ltd., who were further clearing the same to SEZ Unit. 4.  In both the said decisions, it stands held that the benefit of the notification stands rightly availed by M/s. Shree Bajrang Metallics and Power Ltd. The said decisions reported as 2012 (282) ELT 108 (Tri-Del) as also vide Final Order No. C/A/19/2012-CU[DB] dated 13/01/2012. 5.  .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X