9911796707
TMI Blog1993 (2) TMI 331X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ardha in State of Maharashtra for a declaration that he was a tenant of Survey Nos. 7, 8 and 9 of Village Anatargaon. That application was registered as Revenue Case No. 12. Appellant, Warlu, claimed to be a tenant by virtue of a lease granted in his favour by Subhadra and Ahilya, daughters of Mahadeorao through his second wife Parvatibai. On the other hand, Gangotribai, the first wife of Mahadeor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Gangotribai and not Subhadra and Ahilya and, therefore, the claim made by Warlu as tenant of these lands was rejected; and the two references made by the civil court were remanded to the Addl. Tahsildar for inquiry and fresh decision in accordance with law. Thereafter, three revisions arising out of these revenue cases were filed before the Revenue Tribunal by Warlu. These revisions were dismisse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... igh Court's common order dated 20-8-1980 rejecting Writ Petition Nos. 679 of 1974 and 760 of 1974 has been challenged. 5. We do not find any cogent ground given in the application for condonation of delay which in law can constitute sufficient cause to explain the inordinate delay in filing of the special leave petitions. The applications for condonation of delay (I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 of 1992) i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
