2016 (9) TMI 531

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Respondent ORDER The present appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi vide order-in-original No. 7/2006 dated 21.04.2006.  The same order had also been challenged by the assessee as well as partners vide Ex. Appeal Nos. 3216, 2675-2677 and 2708 of 2006.  While considering the appeal filed by the assessees, this Tribunal vide .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of duty in respect of goods cleared from the factory without payment of duty with intent to evade payment of duty.  3.  The brief facts of the case are that assessee is engaged in manufacture of pharmaceutical products falling under Central Excise Tariff  heading 3003 of the First Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.  Investigation was undertaken by the Central Excise .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Smt. Nisha Bhargava as well as Ms. Anjali Bhargava, both partners of the  assessee company.  The Commissioner also imposed penalties on other connected persons, under Rule 209A read with Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 4.  Ld. DR Sh. R. K. Manjhi appeared for the Revenue and submitted that the Commissioner has imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,21,71,986/-.  The said pen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X