Withdrawal of Anti-Dumping Duty - Designated Authority has no power to give retrospective relief

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and M/s. Sanjay Chemicals Versus Designated Authority, Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties Ministry of Finance and others - 2016 (9) TMI 1123 - CESTAT NEW DELHI The Anti-Dumping duty was imposed on imports of Sodium Tripoly Phospate (STPP) originated in or exported from China PR vide Customs Notification No. 58/2011-Cus dated 8.7.2011 Thereafter, on 21.7.2011 a request cam .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uction of STPP by M/s. Tata Chemicals Ltd. and M/s. Rhodia Specialty Chemicals India Ltd. and there being no other known manufacturer for the said goods, there was no justification for continuation of the Anti-Dumping duty. Accordingly, vide his Final Finding dated 10.2.2012, he recommended withdrawal of Anti-Dumping duty, which was originally recommended by the Designated Authority vide earlie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d Authority itself, who has observed that had the Indian manufacturers informed the Designated Authority during the period of first investigations, the investigation might have been discontinued. Tribunal observed that:- Based upon mid term review, the Designated Authority could not have upset, its own Final Finding recorded in original investigation, inasmuch as having not put to challeng .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X