2016 (12) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , GA ORDER Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner is a dealer and an assessee on the file of the first respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The order impugned in this writ petition is an order passed by the second res .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Appellate Authority, then the petitioner should have filed an appeal before the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, for which, the limitation period prescribed is 60 days with another 60 days along with an application for condonation of delay. However, the petitioner was not diligent enough and the time has expired and the petitioner ca .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ribunal, at any time, within five years from the date of any order passed by it, to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record. It may be true that the petitioner has not raised this ground specifically in the grounds of appeal before the second respondent. Nevertheless, this being a legal contention, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted one opportunity to raise t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X