2016 (12) TMI 768

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... respondent    ORDER Although ld. Counsel argues  that arise of waste cotton in the course of manufacture shall not be liable to duty, according to the condition of the contract it is clear that the said waste arose in the hands of job worker.  It cannot be said that both parties to the contract had no knowledge of emergence of waste while fixing the job charges.  It was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed for the principal manufacturer.  2.2  Materials on record reveal that the financial assistance given by the principal manufacturer to the job worker appellant was to serve the above object.  Therefore, the notional interest on the deposit has been rightly computed by the authority and added to the assessable value. 3.  The last count of the argument is that the amount rece .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ellant's last contention is that penalty levied is unwarranted and unreasonable when determination of assessable value and taxability was in confusion.  That may be waived. 6.  When order of the adjudicating authority does not bring out appellant's contumacious conduct to cause evasion and in all issues question of law was involved, there shall be no penalty. 7.  The appeal is all .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X