9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 901X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dvocate), for the Respondent(s) Per Mr. Anil Choudhary: The Revenue have preferred the present appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 09/CE/ALLD/2013 dated 24-06-2013, whereby the demand of Rs. 18,25,883/- was raised under Rule 3 (5A) of CCR, 2004 read with Section 11 A of the Act, along with interest and further equal amount of penalty was imposed under Section 11 AC of the Act, the same have been ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ub-rule 5A of Rule 3 of CCR, 2004, applicable with effect from 16-05-2005. The said rule provides if any capital goods are removed as waste and scrap, the manufacturer shall pay and amount equal to duty leviable on the transaction value. Accordingly, Show Cause Notice dated 29-02-2012 was issued for the extended period 2007-08 and further penalty was proposed under Section 11 AC of the Act. 3. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... either in the question or in the answer given by the Authorised Signatory of the plant that the waste and scarp in question had been generated out of capital goods on which they had taken Modvat/Cenvat credit. The findings of the Adjudicating Authority are based on unsubstantiated presumptions and assumptions. 5. Being aggrieved the Revenue is in appeal on the ground that in view of the provisio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... had been issued by the Legislature or the Board, the Commissioner (Appeals) have rightly set aside the demand and penalty. 7. Having considered the rival contentions, I find that no case have made by the Revenue that the appellant has taken Modvat/Cenvat credit at the time of acquisition of the plant and machinery which was disposed off as scrap during 2007-08. I, further, take a notice of the pr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
