2016 (8) TMI 1142

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Swapnil Bangur with Sham Walve, for the Respondent. ORDER Having heard both sides and on perusing the writ petition and the annexures thereto, including the impugned order dated 24-8-2015 and the further order passed on 30-9-2015/8-10-2015, we are of the opinion that the controversy is squarely covered by the judgment delivered by this Court on 18-7-2016 in Writ Petition No. 2810 of 2015 [M/s. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d), Mumbai/respondent No. 3 to this writ petition, was in total error in refusing to abide by the binding judgment and order of this Court. 3. The writ petition is, therefore, allowed. The impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The interest shall follow in terms of the two Division Bench judgments. In the light of the fact that the Division Bench judgments were pointed out and in the cas .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X