1953 (2) TMI 45

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act the Appellate Tribunal referred to this Court for decision the following question:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case an appeal lay to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner against the order of the Income-tax Officer made under Section 35. The facts as they appear from the statement of the case were: The assessees were the ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... quired by the section. After deducting proportionate excess profits tax attributable to the commission payable to Nanjappa, the income liable to tax was increased from ₹ 61,243 to ₹ 78,979. The assessable income was, therefore, enhanced. There was an appeal against this order by the assessees to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner passed an ord .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... isposed of by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner again expressed the opinion that the order made by the Income-tax Officer was within the purview of Section 35 of the Act but that the order was not justified on merits. This reference was also kept pending as an appeal against a decision of this Court in a similar matter was pending decision before the Suprem .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X