2017 (2) TMI 356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondent. ORDER [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - None present for respondent. Revenue brings out that there is no dispute by the respondent as to fake and spurious goods imported and it was ultimately found to be in breach of law relating to Intellectual Property. So also violation of provisions of Customs Act, 1962. The adjudicating authority while framed three issues in Para 14 of his ord .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... directed destruction of the goods. To that extent only, his order is justified. There being a claimant-importer, the cost of destruction shall be at his cost. Revenue is at liberty to realize respective penalties as has been ordered in the adjudication order. Such realization shall be a message to the society that breach of law is not rewarded with bonus but that shall face penal consequence of l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X