Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1966 (9) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... second proviso to section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922? " The facts giving rise to the above question lie within a very small compass. The assessee is an individual. The assessment year is 1955-56. The relevant accounting year is the financial year 1954-55. During the relevant accounting year the assessee was a partner in an unregistered firm, Messrs. S. B. Production, having one-half share therein. The Income-tax Officer had assessed this unregistered firm and computed its total loss at Rs. 1,01,174. Thus, the assessee's share of loss comes to Rs. 50,587. Apart from this partnership in this unregistered firm, this assessee had income from other sources like salary, house property and dividends. The total income from these oth .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... section 24(1) of the Act was entirely misconceived in the facts and circumstances of the case of his client. Proviso to a section in an Act or statute naturally must have to be read in the context of that particular section and not divorced from it. The second proviso of section 24(1) of the Act has necessarily to take colour and meaning from the main subject-matter of section 24(1) of the Act. The opening words of section 24(1) of the Act use the expression "Where any assessee sustains a loss" of profits or gains in any year under any of the heads mentioned in section 6, he shall be entitled to have the amount of the loss set off against his income, profits or gains under any other head in the year. The words "any assessee" imply an asse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion (5) of section 23, any such loss shall be set off only against the income, profits and gains of the firm and not against the income, profits and gains of any of the partners of the firm ; ... " What thereafter follows relates to the registered firm with which again we are not concerned in this reference. The expression "where the assessee is an unregistered firm" in the second proviso of section 24(1) of the Act means this that the general right of setting off loss under the opening words in the first paragraph of section 24(1) of the Act will not avail where the assessee is an unregistered firm. In other words, if the assessee is an unregistered firm the loss shall only be set off against the income of the unregistered firm, and n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the assessee in the present proceedings is not the unregistered firm of Messrs. S. B. Production but it has otherwise been assessed. If that be so, then such a loss cannot be set off having regard to the clear language used in the second proviso to section 24(1) of the Act. Therefore, the assessee can never really get any help from the argument which Mr. De advanced. Looking at the point from another angle, Mr. De's argument creates a situation that, if the assessee is not an unregistered firm in the sense in which he wanted this court to interpret that language of the second proviso, then every partner of such unregistered firm will be in a position to nullify the whole object, purpose and effect of the second proviso, on the ground then .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to adjust his share of loss sustained by the firm against the profits from his other business in computing his income under section 10 of the Act. The observations there to the effect that the second proviso to section 24(1) cannot be construed as an independent enactment, must be read subject to the provisions of the main section and that its conclusion that the right to set off loss under one head against the profits from another head is in accord with the view that we have taken. (See the observations of Gujarat High Court in the report, specially at pages 365 and 370). Mr. Pal for the Commissioner of Income-tax relied on the Bombay High Court decision in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Jagannath Narsingdas and the Supreme Court decision .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates