9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (5) TMI 1077X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppeal restored - decided in favor of applicant. - E/ROA/70475/2016 E/ROM/70021/2017 APPEAL No.E/54002/2014-EX[DB] - MISC. ORDER NO-70105-70106/2017 - Dated:- 5-4-2017 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri V.K. Baranawal, Advocate for Appellant Shri D.K. Deb, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil Ch ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and others Vs CCE in CEA (defective) No.08/2015 order dated 19th November, 2015, wherein Hon ble High Court have held that in the decision of Tribunal there was an error in rejecting the appeal on the ground of none compliance of the interim order by the appellant-assessee, passed on the stay application. If the appellant fails to comply with the interim order the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on is concerned, this Tribunal asked the Counsel to make a reasonable offer for pre-deposit to which learned Counsel offered an amount of ₹ 03 lakhs. Considering the facts and circumstances and in view of the difficulties expressed in modification application, we modify the earlier stay order dated 02.12.2014 and direct the appellant to make a deposit of ₹ 05 lakhs within 08 weeks from ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
