TMI Blog2017 (5) TMI 1377X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... posed of ₹ 50,000/- to be paid in ‘Prime Minister National Relief Fund’ - appeal restored. - E/902/2005-EX[DB] - Misc ORDER NO-70127/2017 - Dated:- 12-4-2017 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri Siddharth Yadav, Advocate for Appellant Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, Deputy Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: An ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Tribunal could have only proceeded under Rule 20 of the Rules. Even though, the proviso to Rule 20 of the Rules provides for moving a recall application only in the circumstances where the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, it does not mean that the ex-parte order cannot be set aside when sufficient cause is shown by the appellant for non-appearance. The fact, that Rule 20 of the Rules d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nge the impugned order of the Tribunal, if necessary, after the disposal of the restoration application. 4. In view of the directions of the Hon ble Allahabad High Court as noticed herein above, appellant has filed miscellaneous (recall) application on 22nd July, 2016. The observation of this Tribunal is that notices for hearing of the appeal fixed on 20th March, 2015, 28th January, 2015, 24 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellant. The Counsel, appearing for the appellant-M/s Chandravati Polymers Pvt. Ltd. states that the address of the appellant s Company was 46/2 Site IV, Industrial Area Sahibabad, U.P. which changed to c/o Inderprastha Dental College Hospital, 46/1, Site IV, Industrial Area Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, U.P. We find that the said address 46/2 Site IV, Industrial Area Sahibabad, U.P. is given in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|