9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 129X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... naker Bhengra, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Sumeet Gododia, Advocate. ORDER Per D. N. Patel, J. [I.A. No. 1864 of 2017] 1. This interlocutory application has been preferred for deleting the name of Respondent No.2 because the present Tax Appeal has been preferred against the stay order, passed by the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he impugned order, there are three dates i.e. 16.12.2014, 22.12.2014 and 23.12.2014, which is/are under challenge. 6. In the waiver application, stay has been granted without any order of deposition of the amount, for which, order-in-original has been passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax, Jamshedpur dated 16.07.2013 (Annexure-2 to the memo of the Tax Appeal). 7. Counsel for t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT), Kolkata to decide Appeal No. E/71365/2013-DB as early as possible and practicable, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 9. Counsel for both the sides have jointly submitted that they shall co-operate in hearing before the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT), Kolkata and they shal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
