2017 (7) TMI 129

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssed by the Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax, Jamshedpur - Held that: - we see no reason to entertain this Tax Appeal - Nonetheless, looking to the fact that Excise Appeal has been preferred by Respondent No.1, against the order-in-original passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax, Jamshedpur. The said appeal is of the year 2013 and hence, we, hereby, direct the Central E .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aid prayer, this interlocutory application is allowed and Respondent No.2 is permitted to be deleted. 3. Necessary amendment shall be carried out by red ink in the memo of the present Tax Appeal, during course of the day. 4. I.A. No. 1864 of 2017 is allowed and disposed of. [Tax Appeal No. 22 of 2015] 5. Counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that Central Excise and Service .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nted by the learned Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT), Kolkata i.e. looking to the undue hardship on the part of respondent No.1. Even otherwise, this Tax Appeal is not tenable in law. 8. Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the impugned order, passed by the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT), Kolkata, we see no reason to entertai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X