Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (8) TMI 690

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the stockist. It is not a discount which is given to the buyer but it is given only to the stockist - Further, it is noted that these facts were not brought to the notice of the Tribunal - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant. - E/715/2006-Mum - Final Order No. A/85343/2017-WZB/EB - Dated:- 12-1-2017 - Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (J) and Raju, Member (T) Shri N.S. Patel, Advocate, fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cumstances, the quantity discount has been allowed. Learned Counsel argued that quantity discount is admissible and should be allowed to the appellant in the instant case also. 3. Learned AR argued that quantity discount is not admissible in the MRP based consignment. For this purpose, he relied on the Larger Bench s decision of the Tribunal in the case of Indica Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. - 2007 ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lant to the stockist/distributor. For this assertion, learned AR relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Rishabh Instruments Pvt. Ltd. - 2008 (226) E.L.T. 230 (Tri.-Mum.). 4. We have gone through the rival submissions. It is seen that the contract entered into by the appellant with the Government of Maharashtra through the Director, Medical Education and Research, Mumbai, clearly .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... It is not a discount which is given to the buyer but it is given only to the stockist. Further, it is noted that these facts were not brought to the notice of the Tribunal when the earlier Order No. A/85812/16/EB, dated 8-1-2016 was passed. 5. In view of the above facts, we find no merit in the appeal filed by the appellant. The appeal is therefore dismissed. (Pronounced in Court on 12-1-201 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates