2017 (10) TMI 180

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellant Mr. B. V. Jhaveri i/b. Mr. Arjun Gupta for the Respondent ORDER 1. When these Appeals were placed before us, a very strange development has been brought to our notice by Mr. Jhaveri. 2. Although there is a Full Bench judgment in the field with regard to the ambit and scope of powers of the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... objection to the restoration of the Appeals to the file of this Court because there was enormous delay and running into more than two to three years. There was an affidavitinreply of the assessee and he opposed such restoration effected routinely or as a matter of course. 4. Though such an affidavitin reply was on record, the complaint of Mr. Jhaveri is that no hearing has been given to the asses .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ourt, we deem it fit and proper to set aside the orders of the Prothonotary and Senior Master of restoration of these Appeals and registering them. We place the Revenue's Notices of Motion seeking to quash and set aside the initial order of the Prothonotary and Senior Master invoking Rules 985 and 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1960. We post the Chamber Orders of the Reven .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X