9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 1069X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant: Shri Rishi Sood, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri Abhishek, Advocate ORDER This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 24th April, 2017, passed by Ld. Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal") Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby and whereunder application preferred by the appellant under section 9 of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ebt the application under section 9 of I&B Code, 2016 was maintainable. 3. We have heard Ld. Counsel for the appellant and perused the record. There is nothing on the record to suggest that the appellant reached any agreement with the respondent/ corporate debtor for purchase of a plot in Ozone City, Aligarh. A receipt has been enclosed which shows that an amount of Rs. 30 Iacs was deposited in a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent or any local authority" 6. Admittedly, the appellant has not made any claim in respect of goods. The appellant has also not rendered any services for which he is entitled to claim any amount. It is not the case of the appellant that he was in employment or a debt in respect of repayrnent of dues arising under any law is due to him. As the dues to which the appellant claim does not arise under ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
