2016 (11) TMI 1489

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ORDER This appeal is filed by appellant against order-in-original wherein adjudicating authority has imposed a penalty of Rs. 75,000/- under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. None appeared on behalf of appellant despite notice. Since the matter is of 2008, I take up the appeal for disposal. Heard learned AR. 3. Learned DR submits that the penalty imposed on appellant und .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e order-in-original which runs into 87 pages, no findings have been recorded by adjudicating authority as to how the appellant herein had abetted or violated the provisions of Central Excise Rules, 2002. It is seen from the records that appellant being a regular transporter had documents like CT-3, excise invoices which were indicating the delivery should be made at Muradabad while the goods were .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X