9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 1481X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iling undue and inadmissible export benefits such as Duty Drawback, DEPB, etc. For this offence, the licence of the appellant was suspended in the year 2009 at Mumbai Office of Customs. Mumbai Customs office had also intimated about the suspension of licence to Delhi Customs office. The licence was restored as per the order of CESTAT dated 21-5-2012. When Delhi Customs office, after receiving t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is directed against Order-in-Original No. 74/SM/POLICY/2016, dated 13-10-2016 passed by Commissioner Customs, New Delhi. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was holding CHA licence issued from Delhi Customs office with authorization to work at Mumbai Port. In the year 2009, certain syndicates were engaged in the export of fabrics and ready-made garments of inferior quality thr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion to withdraw the order of suspension of CHA licence No. 11/1051 with immediate effect. We note, that the aforesaid directions issued by CESTAT were never challenged by the department. However, suddenly by the impugned order, the licence of the appellant was revoked again for the same offence committed in the year 2009. Being aggrieved, the appellant has filed the present appeal. 3. With the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7, dated 28-5-2012, revoked the licence again. 5. We note that when Delhi Customs office, after receiving the CESTAT order and reports from Mumbai Customs office had not taken any action, and the licence of appellant was restored by setting aside the suspension, then there is no occasion for Delhi Customs office to restart administrative action for revocation of the licence. It amounts to doubl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
